RWA LEGAL
INDEX
Guide · Platform cost

What an RWA tokenization platform costs to build or buy

Published platform figures run from a few hundred dollars a month to several million for a custom build. They are not competing quotes — they are three different products with one label.

Last verified 19 September 2026

"What does a tokenization platform cost?" has no single answer because the question covers three purchases that differ by two orders of magnitude. A monthly seat on someone else's platform, a configured white-label deployment and a bespoke build are all truthfully described as platform cost. Our dataset holds 17 published platform figures, and the spread between the lowest and highest is roughly 10000× — the widest of any component we track.

This page separates the three, using the same sourced figures as the cost index. Every number keeps its provider, source and date, and is flagged for whether the source sells what it is pricing.

Three products, one label

What you are buyingWho it suitsWhat you give up
SaaS subscription
Monthly seat on a shared platform
A first issuance, a pilot, or an issuer testing whether the model works at all Control over the roadmap, deep customisation, and usually the ability to take the stack with you
Configured white label
One-time setup on a vendor's codebase
An issuer who needs their own brand and workflow but not their own engineering Dependence on the vendor's release cycle and standards support
Custom build
Bespoke development
An operator whose product is the platform, or one with requirements no vendor meets Time, and an ongoing engineering and audit obligation that does not end at launch

The decision is rarely about price. It is about whether the platform is your product or your plumbing. If it is plumbing, a custom build buys you a maintenance liability.

Published SaaS and recurring figures

ProviderRangeCadenceSource dateSells this?As publishedSource
Tokenizer.estate $2,000–$5,000 monthly 2026-05-15 yes $2,000-$5,000 per month basic SaaS view
Stobox $499–$1,999 monthly 2026-07-10 yes Free -> $499/mo Core -> $1,999/mo Advanced view
Nadcab Labs $3,000–$10,000 monthly 2026-06-10 yes $3,000-$10,000 Monthly white-label platform fees view
OmiSoft $300–$1,500 monthly 2026-07-03 yes White-label monthly $300-$1,500/month view

A monthly figure is the easiest number to underestimate over a five-year horizon. Multiply before comparing it with a one-time build.

Published setup and build figures

ProviderRangeSource dateSells this?As publishedSource
Tokenizer.estate $10,000–$100,000 2026-05-15 yes $10,000 and $100,000 platform technology view
Tokenizer.estate $100,000–$250,000 2026-05-15 yes $100,000 to $250,000 production-ready platforms view
InvestaX $10,000–$100,000 2025-05-16 yes $10,000 and $100,000 Technology Infrastructure view
Stobox $1,499–$6,999 2026-07-10 yes Raisable window $1,499/$2,999 self-directed or $3,499/$6,999 broker-routed view
Securitize $50,000–$100,000 2026-03 no minimum engagement threshold of $50,000 to $100,000 bundles setup and issuance view
Republic pct_of_raise 6–pct_of_raise 10 2026-03 no 6% to 10% of total funds raised plus 2% equity or token allocation view
Nadcab Labs $30,000–$80,000 2026-06-10 yes $30,000-$80,000 White-label platform setup view
Nadcab Labs $100,000–$300,000 2026-06-10 yes $100,000-$300,000 Custom-built platform development view
RWA.io $50,000–$150,000 2025-09-17 no Costs can range from $50,000 to $150,000 platform architecture & design view
RWA.io $800,000–$3,000,000 2025-09-17 no from $800,000 to over $3 million view
RWA.io $100,000–$500,000 2025-09-17 no from $100,000 to $500,000 view
OmiSoft $25,000–$50,000 2026-07-03 yes White-label license one-time $25,000-$50,000 view
Brickken $5,000 2026-03 no initial setup fee of approximately $5,000 for basic deployments view

These rows mix white-label setup with full custom development. Where a source distinguishes the two, its wording says so in the "As published" column — that wording is the only reliable guide to what the figure covers.

Smart contracts are a separate line, priced by standard

Smart-contract development is frequently folded into "platform" and should not be. Our dataset holds 12 published figures for it, and the most useful sources tie price to the token standard rather than to vague complexity — because the standard is what determines whether permissioning and transfer restrictions are built in.

ProviderRangeAsset / standardSource dateSells this?As publishedSource
Tokenizer.estate $20,000–$100,000 real estate 2026-05-15 yes $20,000 to $100,000 token development and issuance view
InvestaX $20,000–$100,000 generic 2025-05-16 yes $20,000 and $100,000 Token Development and Issuance view
Gofaizen & Sherle €20,000–€50,000 real estate 2026-03-18 yes Token issuance & compliance design EUR20,000-50,000 view
Stobox $1,248 generic 2026-07-10 yes Compass on-chain $1,248 total mint $499 + deploy $749 view
Nadcab Labs $15,000–$30,000 ERC20 2026-06-10 yes $15,000-$30,000 ERC-20 basic tokens view
Nadcab Labs $40,000–$70,000 ERC3643 2026-06-10 yes $40,000-$70,000 ERC-3643 compliant security tokens view
Nadcab Labs $60,000–$120,000 ERC1400 2026-06-10 yes $60,000-$120,000 ERC-1400 with partition logic view
TokenizeStartup CHF 20,000–CHF 100,000 technical 2026-04 no typically runs CHF 20,000 to CHF 100,000 view
RWA.io $75,000–$250,000 generic 2025-09-17 no anywhere from $75,000 to $250,000 depending on complexity view
OmiSoft $5,000–$25,000 real estate 2026-07-03 yes Smart contracts $5,000-$25,000 view
Primior $10,000–$25,000 real estate 2026-04-14 yes $10,000-$25,000 basic STO script MVP view
Primior $100,000–$300,000 real estate 2026-04-14 yes $100,000-$300,000+ custom enterprise platforms view

Audit is not included in most of those figures. Security review is priced separately in our dataset — see audit rows — and the range there mixes smart-contract security review with asset valuation and due diligence, which are unrelated work. Ask any provider which of the two their audit line refers to.

What platform pricing usually excludes

The published figures above buy software. They do not buy the things that make the software lawful or useful:

Most named platforms publish nothing

Worth stating plainly: of the platform figures we hold, only a handful attach to a specific named platform, and those came from third-party reviews and aggregators rather than a vendor price list. Several of the largest issuance platforms disclose no fees at all.

That is why this page prices categories rather than ranking vendors. The fields a ranked comparison would need — supported standards, jurisdictions, how transfer controls are enforced, custody model, required intermediaries, named clients — are not publicly verifiable for most providers today. The platforms page explains the four categories and what to verify yourself.

How to make quotes comparable

See all 130 cost figures Download the dataset Request a jurisdiction shortlist

Reference material, not advice, and not an endorsement of any provider named. If you hold a published platform price we have missed, send it with its source and it goes in.